In a world where misinformation spreads like wildfire, it’s easy to get caught up in the whirlwind of panic and confusion. Picture this: you’ve been steering clear of Japanese seafood, haunted by the nightmarish thought of morphing into Professor X due to the alleged radioactive contamination from the Fukushima nuclear plant’s wastewater release.
But what if this alarming news was purportedly disseminated by a source as reputable as the Wall Street Journal? A source that has graced many a bibliography in scholarly theses across the globe.
Before you spiral further into the vortex of confusion, let’s unravel this tangled web of misinformation together.
SFA Responds to Wall Street Journal’s Allegations That Singapore Has Found Radioactive Food from Japan
On Sunday (3 Sep), the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) decided to step into the eye of the storm to clear the murky waters surrounding the allegations of radioactive food imports from Japan.
The agency vehemently denied finding any contaminated food samples from Japan, following the recent release of wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear plant.
This clarification came as a response to a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) podcast titled “More Countries Ban Import of Japanese Food”, which had set the rumor mill ablaze.
This podcast, posted on 24 August claimed that “Singapore has found radioactive contamination in vegetable samples from Japan”
But here’s where the plot thickens: the podcast was referring to a media release from way back in 2011, a time when the wounds of the Fukushima nuclear disaster were still fresh.
In a riveting turn of events, the SFA revealed that the podcast had resurrected news from a decade ago, discussing bans on seafood from certain countries post the 2011 Fukushima nuclear catastrophe.
The podcaster had stated, “Separately, Singapore said it found radioactive contamination in four samples of vegetables imported from Japan and has extended the ban to food from two more Japanese prefectures.”
This statement, it turns out, was a blast from the past, echoing the sentiments of a world still reeling from the aftermath of the disaster.
Fast forward to the present day, and the SFA is leaving no stone unturned in ensuring the safety of food imports.
Adopting a science-based approach to assess food safety risks, the agency has implemented a stringent surveillance and monitoring regime. This includes radiation surveillance, with the promise of swift enforcement actions should any food imports be found unsafe or unsuitable for consumption.
Back on 3 August 2023, Minister for Sustainability and the Environment, Grace Fu, emphasized that the SFA has been vigilantly monitoring food imports, including those from Japan, especially in light of Japan’s recent decision to release Fukushima wastewater into the Pacific Ocean.
She further added, “The National Environment Agency (NEA) assesses that Japan’s planned discharge of treated radioactive water from the Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea is unlikely to impact the seawater in or around Singapore waters.”
As the world watched with bated breath, Japanese authorities commenced the discharge of treated water used to cool the damaged reactors into the sea on 24 August.
In a beacon of hope, Japan’s fisheries agency reported that fish tested in waters around the Fukushima nuclear plant showed no detectable levels of radiation, a mere two days after the waters were released.
However, the ripple effects of the release were felt far and wide, with China banning all Japanese seafood imports, and Hong Kong restricting “aquatic products” from 10 Japanese prefectures.
South Korea too witnessed a surge of public outcry, with around 50,000 people rallying for the government to take action, culminating in protests and arrests in Seoul.
Singapore has not imposed a ban; nevertheless, the news has affected the bottom line of Japanese restaurants in Singapore, with them reporting up to 20% fewer customers.